Compare
Head Radical MP 2025 vs Nike Zoom GP Challenge 1.5 vs Wilson Pro Staff 97 Classic
Axes first, then the short verdict. The overall Court Score is not an average.
Listing
Court Score
3
3
3
Powerfree depth
3
4
3
Controlaim when swinging out
4
3
5
Spinshape / dip
3
3
3
Comfortarm-friendly sessions
4
4
3
Valueworth street price
5
2
3
Verdict
The classic all-court Radical—control-leaning 98 with Auxetic 2.0 feel, enough spin to shape, and real street-price value if you supply the pace.
Nike’s current dual-Zoom hard-court cushion shoe—bouncier first step than Vapor, planted enough for aggressive cuts, heavy and often snug, list price that needs a sale to feel fair.
The current Pro Staff midplus—same v14 playability in classic black paint—surgical aim and plow for players who supply the pace, not free depth.