Compare
Head Gravity MP 2025 vs Nike Zoom GP Challenge 1.5 vs Wilson Pro Staff 97 Classic
Axes first, then the short verdict. The overall Court Score is not an average.
Listing
Court Score
3
3
3
Powerfree depth
3
4
3
Controlaim when swinging out
4
3
5
Spinshape / dip
3
3
3
Comfortarm-friendly sessions
5
4
3
Valueworth street price
3
2
3
Verdict
The soft, teardrop midplus that pockets the ball like butter—unique feel and aim for club players who supply pace and hate boardy beams.
Nike’s current dual-Zoom hard-court cushion shoe—bouncier first step than Vapor, planted enough for aggressive cuts, heavy and often snug, list price that needs a sale to feel fair.
The current Pro Staff midplus—same v14 playability in classic black paint—surgical aim and plow for players who supply the pace, not free depth.